Federal credit union · Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · NCUA charter #1239
Pittsburgh City Hall Employees
Health score 65/100, grade C (Good) - from the NCUA 5300 Call Report, 2025Q4.
- 65
- Health / 100
- $57.8M
- Total assets
- 2,627
- Members
- 8.9%
- Net-worth ratio
Pittsburgh City Hall Employees scores 65/100 on PlainCU's health composite from NCUA 5300 Call Report data (2025Q4). Assets $57.8M; members 2,627; net-worth ratio 8.89%; health rank #3,886 of 4,374; healthier than 11th of scored peers.
Federal Call Report extract
NCUA 5300 Call Report Masthead
#3,886 of 4,374 health · 2025Q4Pittsburgh City Hall · health 65/100 · $57.8M · 2025Q4
Call Report peers
Pittsburgh City Hall Employees in the assets neighbourhood
Subscribe to this credit union's financial changes (RSS) — one item per NCUA 5300 call report, no account required.
Pittsburgh City Hall Employees vs every NCUA-scored credit union
The busiest band is 85-89 (858 credit unions); Pittsburgh City Hall Employees sits in 65-69 with 275 others.
65 11th percentile higher than 11% of 4,374 credit unions
every scored credit union, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more credit unions. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source NCUA 5300 Call Report aggregates · 2025Q4
Peer-gap read for Pittsburgh City Hall Employees
- Delinquency Rate leads the peer set - 0.76% here, 0.96% peer average (-0.21 pp).
- Widest shortfall vs peers is Loan-to-Share Ratio: -24.98 pp (37.62% vs 62.60%).
Pittsburgh City Hall Employees: in-state Call Report ranks
- In Pennsylvania, health place is #241 of 275 on the same NCUA-ratio sort used nationally.
- By total assets, Pittsburgh City Hall Employees is #112 of 275 in Pennsylvania.
- Member book place in Pennsylvania: #147 of 275.
- One place up in Pennsylvania, Par-Del Emp. (#240) ties at 65/100; one place down, Iron Workers (#242) ties at 65/100.
How Pittsburgh City Hall Employees's 5300 filing moved
Pittsburgh City Hall Employees: total assets by quarter
2023Q4 to 2026Q1, NCUA 5300
- Assets moved -1.1% from $57.8M (2025Q4) to $57.2M (2026Q1).
- Net-worth ratio shifted +0.05 pp (8.84% → 8.89%).
8.89% net worth puts this credit union above the NCUA's 7.0% well-capitalized bar (Prompt Corrective Action rules).
How the 65/100 score is built
Pittsburgh City Hall Employees gives up 35 points in total. Return on Assets costs the most, 15 of its 15; Delinquency Rate loses the least, 2.6.
- Net Worth Ratio 27.2 pts
- Delinquency Rate 22.4 pts
- Return on Assets 0.0 pts
- Member Growth 6.4 pts
- Loan-to-Share Ratio 9.0 pts
Pittsburgh City Hall health metrics
| Metric | Value | vs peer |
|---|---|---|
| Net Worth Ratio | 8.89% | -4.73 pp |
| Delinquency Rate | 0.76% | -0.21 pp |
| Return on Assets | -0.92% | -1.58 pp |
| Member Growth | -1.46% | - |
| Loan-to-Share Ratio | 37.62% | -24.98 pp |
Peer averages: $50M–$100M cohort, 584 credit unions, 2025Q4 filing.
Pittsburgh City Hall Employees quarterly book
| Quarter | Assets | Members |
|---|---|---|
| 2026Q1 | $57.2M | - |
| 2025Q4 | $57.8M | 2,627 |
| 2024Q4 | $57.6M | 2,666 |
| 2023Q4 | $54.1M | 2,674 |
Credit Union Details
- Charter Number
- 1239
- Type
- Federal
- Field of Membership
- Multiple Common Bond
- Peer Group
- $50M–$100M
- State
- Pennsylvania
- City
- Pittsburgh
- Data Quarter
- 2025Q4
Branch Location
Pittsburgh City Hall Employees operates a single office in Pittsburgh, per its most recent NCUA branch filing.
| Office | City |
|---|---|
| Main Office (Main Office) | Pittsburgh, PA |
Source: NCUA Credit Union Branch Information, 2025Q4 filing.
Nearby Credit Unions in Pennsylvania
Other federally-insured credit unions in Pennsylvania, closest first by peer group and asset size.
- MORRISONS COVE 1STROARING SPRING, PA · $50M–$100M86Health
- MERHOJOHNSTOWN, PA · $50M–$100M88Health
- PENNSTARHermitage, PA · $50M–$100M81Health
- WYOMING VALLEY EDUCATIONAL EMPLWilkes Barre, PA · $50M–$100M76Health
- PENNPhiladelphia, PA · $50M–$100M68Health
Compare Pittsburgh City Hall Employees vs MORRISONS COVE 1ST
Other-state peers near Pittsburgh City Hall Employees
Using this data
- Pittsburgh City Hall Employees ranks #3,886 of 4,374 nationally on financial health and #241 of 275 in PA -- the national figure is a benchmark, not a prediction for how any specific account performs. National health rankings
- Morrisons Cove 1st is a nearby credit union with a similar profile -- compare the two side by side before deciding where to bank. Compare with Morrisons Cove 1st
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Pittsburgh City Hall Employees financially healthy?
Pittsburgh City Hall Employees has a financial health score of 65/100 (Good) from its 2025Q4 NCUA 5300 Call Report. It ranks #3,886 of 4,374 nationally on health and #241 of 275 in Pennsylvania. Its net worth ratio is 8.89% and its delinquency rate 0.76%.
How does Pittsburgh City Hall Employees compare to other credit unions?
Pittsburgh City Hall Employees scores 65/100, higher than 11% of the 4,374 scored credit unions. Against the 584 peers in the $50M–$100M cohort, its widest edge is delinquency rate (0.76% vs 0.96%). Its widest shortfall is loan-to-share ratio (37.62% vs 62.60%).
How can I join Pittsburgh City Hall Employees?
Pittsburgh City Hall Employees serves multiple common-bond groups, membership usually requires belonging to one of several qualifying employers, associations, or organizations the credit union has chartered to serve. Contact Pittsburgh City Hall Employees directly for the current list of qualifying groups.
Is my money safe at Pittsburgh City Hall Employees?
Pittsburgh City Hall Employees is a federal credit union; its shares are federally insured by the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF), administered by the NCUA. Each individual depositor is insured up to $250,000, the same limit as FDIC-insured banks. Pittsburgh City Hall Employees's net worth ratio of 8.89% exceeds the 7% threshold NCUA considers "well capitalized."
Every figure on PlainCU is rendered directly from NCUA quarterly call report data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.