ROCKFORD MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES vs TEE-PAK
Side-by-side comparison based on NCUA quarterly call report data.
Financial Metrics Comparison
| Metric | ROCKFORD MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES | TEE-PAK |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score 0–100, higher is better | 73 | 73 |
| Total Assets | $23.5M | $23.5M |
| Members | 2,129 | 2,301 |
| Net Worth Ratio Higher = better capitalized (≥7% = "well capitalized") | 15.59% | 12.61% |
| Delinquency Rate Lower = fewer past-due loans | 0.25% | 0.65% |
| Return on Assets (ROA) Higher = more profitable | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Loan-to-Share Ratio Higher = more loans deployed vs deposits | 51.32% | 61.24% |
| Member Growth Year-over-year membership change | -2.7% | -3.8% |
Teal/bold = better performer on that metric. Financial ratios from most recently reported NCUA quarter.
Membership & Structure
| Detail | ROCKFORD MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES | TEE-PAK |
|---|---|---|
| Location | Rockford, IL | Danville, IL |
| Charter Type | State | State |
| Field of Membership | Other | Other |
| Peer Group | $10M–$50M | $10M–$50M |
| Charter Number | 62826 | 60390 |
What This Comparison Says About ROCKFORD MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES vs TEE-PAK
ROCKFORD MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES (Rockford, IL) and TEE-PAK (Danville, IL) are both federally-insured credit unions reporting quarterly to the NCUA, but they differ meaningfully in scale and profile. ROCKFORD MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES holds $23.5M in assets across 2,129 members, while TEE-PAK holds $23.5M across 2,301 members. Both institutions post health scores of 73/100 and 73/100, a narrow spread that suggests similar overall financial profiles despite differences in size. Charter numbers 62826 and 60390 indicate entirely separate NCUA supervisory records; they operate under peer groups $10M–$50M and $10M–$50M respectively.
Capital adequacy is the first check: ROCKFORD MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES's net worth ratio of 15.59% clears the NCUA's 7.0% "well capitalized" bar, while TEE-PAK posts 12.61%. Loan quality — measured as loans 60+ days past due over total loans — comes in at 0.25% for ROCKFORD MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES and 0.65% for TEE-PAK; lower is tighter. Earnings efficiency (ROA) shows 0.000% versus 0.000%, though credit unions as not-for-profit cooperatives often report ROA near zero by design, returning surplus to members through rates and dividends. Loan-to-share ratios of 51.32% and 61.24% indicate how each institution deploys member deposits — the 60–80% band is generally considered the balanced-liquidity window by industry analysts.
Both credit unions are covered by NCUSIF federal insurance up to $250,000 per depositor per ownership category, the same limit as FDIC coverage at banks — so the comparison here is about financial efficiency and member experience, not deposit safety. Before joining either institution, verify the field of membership: ROCKFORD MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES is currently defined as "Other" and TEE-PAK as "Other", and eligibility rules (employer, geography, association) determine who can actually open accounts. Current deposit rates, loan APRs, fees, and product availability change continuously and are not reflected in quarterly Call Report data — contact each credit union directly before opening accounts or borrowing. This comparison is informational only and is not financial advice, an endorsement, or a solicitation; credit union performance can shift materially quarter to quarter and should be re-evaluated with current reports before making any decision.
What to Consider When Choosing
Net Worth Ratio: The NCUA requires credit unions to maintain a net worth ratio of at least 7% to be considered "well capitalized." ROCKFORD MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES shows 15.59% vs TEE-PAK at 12.61%. Higher ratios indicate stronger financial buffers.
Delinquency Rate: Measures the percentage of loans that are 60+ days past due. Lower delinquency rates indicate tighter underwriting and lower credit risk. ROCKFORD MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES: 0.25% — TEE-PAK: 0.65%.
Return on Assets: ROA measures how efficiently a credit union generates income from its assets. Industry benchmark is typically 0.50–0.70%. Both values here may be close to zero since credit unions are not-for-profit and return value to members through lower rates and higher dividends.
Membership eligibility: Check each credit union's field of membership before applying. Many restrict membership by employer, geography, or community affiliation.