MID PLAINS vs SALINA MUNICIPAL

Side-by-side comparison based on NCUA quarterly call report data.

SALINA MUNICIPAL scores higher on overall financial health (health score: 72/100). Higher health scores reflect stronger capital ratios, lower delinquency, and better earnings.

Data note: This comparison uses NCUA quarterly call report data. Financial ratios reflect the most recently reported quarter. This is not a recommendation to join or leave any credit union. Membership eligibility, rates, and services vary. Verify current rates and terms directly with each credit union before making any financial decisions.
MID PLAINS
Health 52/100

GLASCO, KS

State

Data: 2025Q4

SALINA MUNICIPAL
Health 72/100

SALINA, KS

State

Data: 2025Q4

Financial Metrics Comparison

Metric MID PLAINS SALINA MUNICIPAL
Health Score 0–100, higher is better 52 72
Total Assets $1.2M $1.4M
Members 239 358
Net Worth Ratio Higher = better capitalized (≥7% = "well capitalized") 18.04% 7.66%
Delinquency Rate Lower = fewer past-due loans 6.84% 0.00%
Return on Assets (ROA) Higher = more profitable 0.000% 0.000%
Loan-to-Share Ratio Higher = more loans deployed vs deposits 84.64% 82.04%
Member Growth Year-over-year membership change -1.6% -1.9%

Teal/bold = better performer on that metric. Financial ratios from most recently reported NCUA quarter.

Membership & Structure

Detail MID PLAINS SALINA MUNICIPAL
Location GLASCO, KS SALINA, KS
Charter Type State State
Field of Membership Other Other
Peer Group Under $2M Under $2M
Charter Number 67812 67800

What This Comparison Says About MID PLAINS vs SALINA MUNICIPAL

MID PLAINS (GLASCO, KS) and SALINA MUNICIPAL (SALINA, KS) are both federally-insured credit unions reporting quarterly to the NCUA, but they differ meaningfully in scale and profile. MID PLAINS holds $1.2M in assets across 239 members, while SALINA MUNICIPAL holds $1.4M across 358 members. On the composite health score, SALINA MUNICIPAL comes out ahead at 72/100 versus 52/100 for its counterpart — a gap driven by the weighted combination of capital, loan quality, earnings, growth, and liquidity metrics shown above. Charter numbers 67812 and 67800 indicate entirely separate NCUA supervisory records; they operate under peer groups Under $2M and Under $2M respectively.

Capital adequacy is the first check: MID PLAINS's net worth ratio of 18.04% clears the NCUA's 7.0% "well capitalized" bar, while SALINA MUNICIPAL posts 7.66%. Loan quality — measured as loans 60+ days past due over total loans — comes in at 6.84% for MID PLAINS and 0.00% for SALINA MUNICIPAL; lower is tighter. Earnings efficiency (ROA) shows 0.000% versus 0.000%, though credit unions as not-for-profit cooperatives often report ROA near zero by design, returning surplus to members through rates and dividends. Loan-to-share ratios of 84.64% and 82.04% indicate how each institution deploys member deposits — the 60–80% band is generally considered the balanced-liquidity window by industry analysts.

Both credit unions are covered by NCUSIF federal insurance up to $250,000 per depositor per ownership category, the same limit as FDIC coverage at banks — so the comparison here is about financial efficiency and member experience, not deposit safety. Before joining either institution, verify the field of membership: MID PLAINS is currently defined as "Other" and SALINA MUNICIPAL as "Other", and eligibility rules (employer, geography, association) determine who can actually open accounts. Current deposit rates, loan APRs, fees, and product availability change continuously and are not reflected in quarterly Call Report data — contact each credit union directly before opening accounts or borrowing. This comparison is informational only and is not financial advice, an endorsement, or a solicitation; credit union performance can shift materially quarter to quarter and should be re-evaluated with current reports before making any decision.

What to Consider When Choosing

Net Worth Ratio: The NCUA requires credit unions to maintain a net worth ratio of at least 7% to be considered "well capitalized." MID PLAINS shows 18.04% vs SALINA MUNICIPAL at 7.66%. Higher ratios indicate stronger financial buffers.

Delinquency Rate: Measures the percentage of loans that are 60+ days past due. Lower delinquency rates indicate tighter underwriting and lower credit risk. MID PLAINS: 6.84% — SALINA MUNICIPAL: 0.00%.

Return on Assets: ROA measures how efficiently a credit union generates income from its assets. Industry benchmark is typically 0.50–0.70%. Both values here may be close to zero since credit unions are not-for-profit and return value to members through lower rates and higher dividends.

Membership eligibility: Check each credit union's field of membership before applying. Many restrict membership by employer, geography, or community affiliation.

Source: NCUA Quarterly Call Report Data. Source: NCUA Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF), federal deposit insurance up to $250,000 per depositor. Financial data reflects the most recently reported quarter. Not affiliated with NCUA. All data is for informational purposes only.