IDB GLOBAL vs WRIGHT PATMAN CONGRESSIONAL

Side-by-side comparison based on NCUA quarterly call report data.

IDB GLOBAL scores higher on overall financial health (health score: 88/100). Higher health scores reflect stronger capital ratios, lower delinquency, and better earnings.

Data note: This comparison uses NCUA quarterly call report data. Financial ratios reflect the most recently reported quarter. This is not a recommendation to join or leave any credit union. Membership eligibility, rates, and services vary. Verify current rates and terms directly with each credit union before making any financial decisions.
IDB GLOBAL
Health 88/100

WASHINGTON, DC

Federal

Data: 2025Q4

WRIGHT PATMAN CONGRESSIONAL
Health 80/100

WASHINGTON, DC

Federal

Data: 2025Q4

Financial Metrics Comparison

Metric IDB GLOBAL WRIGHT PATMAN CONGRESSIONAL
Health Score 0–100, higher is better 88 80
Total Assets $826.0M $1.3B
Members 13,850 51,946
Net Worth Ratio Higher = better capitalized (≥7% = "well capitalized") 12.36% 10.44%
Delinquency Rate Lower = fewer past-due loans 0.29% 1.24%
Return on Assets (ROA) Higher = more profitable 0.000% 0.000%
Loan-to-Share Ratio Higher = more loans deployed vs deposits 80.49% 66.76%
Member Growth Year-over-year membership change 10.5% 7.7%

Teal/bold = better performer on that metric. Financial ratios from most recently reported NCUA quarter.

Membership & Structure

Detail IDB GLOBAL WRIGHT PATMAN CONGRESSIONAL
Location WASHINGTON, DC WASHINGTON, DC
Charter Type Federal Federal
Field of Membership Community Multiple Common Bond
Peer Group Over $500M Over $500M
Charter Number 14176 8797

What This Comparison Says About IDB GLOBAL vs WRIGHT PATMAN CONGRESSIONAL

IDB GLOBAL (WASHINGTON, DC) and WRIGHT PATMAN CONGRESSIONAL (WASHINGTON, DC) are both federally-insured credit unions reporting quarterly to the NCUA, but they differ meaningfully in scale and profile. IDB GLOBAL holds $826.0M in assets across 13,850 members, while WRIGHT PATMAN CONGRESSIONAL holds $1.3B across 51,946 members. On the composite health score, IDB GLOBAL comes out ahead at 88/100 versus 80/100 for its counterpart — a gap driven by the weighted combination of capital, loan quality, earnings, growth, and liquidity metrics shown above. Charter numbers 14176 and 8797 indicate entirely separate NCUA supervisory records; they operate under peer groups Over $500M and Over $500M respectively.

Capital adequacy is the first check: IDB GLOBAL's net worth ratio of 12.36% clears the NCUA's 7.0% "well capitalized" bar, while WRIGHT PATMAN CONGRESSIONAL posts 10.44%. Loan quality — measured as loans 60+ days past due over total loans — comes in at 0.29% for IDB GLOBAL and 1.24% for WRIGHT PATMAN CONGRESSIONAL; lower is tighter. Earnings efficiency (ROA) shows 0.000% versus 0.000%, though credit unions as not-for-profit cooperatives often report ROA near zero by design, returning surplus to members through rates and dividends. Loan-to-share ratios of 80.49% and 66.76% indicate how each institution deploys member deposits — the 60–80% band is generally considered the balanced-liquidity window by industry analysts.

Both credit unions are covered by NCUSIF federal insurance up to $250,000 per depositor per ownership category, the same limit as FDIC coverage at banks — so the comparison here is about financial efficiency and member experience, not deposit safety. Before joining either institution, verify the field of membership: IDB GLOBAL is currently defined as "Community" and WRIGHT PATMAN CONGRESSIONAL as "Multiple Common Bond", and eligibility rules (employer, geography, association) determine who can actually open accounts. Current deposit rates, loan APRs, fees, and product availability change continuously and are not reflected in quarterly Call Report data — contact each credit union directly before opening accounts or borrowing. This comparison is informational only and is not financial advice, an endorsement, or a solicitation; credit union performance can shift materially quarter to quarter and should be re-evaluated with current reports before making any decision.

What to Consider When Choosing

Net Worth Ratio: The NCUA requires credit unions to maintain a net worth ratio of at least 7% to be considered "well capitalized." IDB GLOBAL shows 12.36% vs WRIGHT PATMAN CONGRESSIONAL at 10.44%. Higher ratios indicate stronger financial buffers.

Delinquency Rate: Measures the percentage of loans that are 60+ days past due. Lower delinquency rates indicate tighter underwriting and lower credit risk. IDB GLOBAL: 0.29% — WRIGHT PATMAN CONGRESSIONAL: 1.24%.

Return on Assets: ROA measures how efficiently a credit union generates income from its assets. Industry benchmark is typically 0.50–0.70%. Both values here may be close to zero since credit unions are not-for-profit and return value to members through lower rates and higher dividends.

Membership eligibility: Check each credit union's field of membership before applying. Many restrict membership by employer, geography, or community affiliation.

Source: NCUA Quarterly Call Report Data. Source: NCUA Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF), federal deposit insurance up to $250,000 per depositor. Financial data reflects the most recently reported quarter. Not affiliated with NCUA. All data is for informational purposes only.