EAGLE vs KAN COLO

Side-by-side comparison based on NCUA quarterly call report data.

KAN COLO scores higher on overall financial health (health score: 83/100). Higher health scores reflect stronger capital ratios, lower delinquency, and better earnings.

Data note: This comparison uses NCUA quarterly call report data. Financial ratios reflect the most recently reported quarter. This is not a recommendation to join or leave any credit union. Membership eligibility, rates, and services vary. Verify current rates and terms directly with each credit union before making any financial decisions.
EAGLE
Health 68/100

ATCHISON, KS

Federal

Data: 2025Q4

KAN COLO
Health 83/100

HOISINGTON, KS

State

Data: 2025Q4

Financial Metrics Comparison

Metric EAGLE KAN COLO
Health Score 0–100, higher is better 68 83
Total Assets $1.7M $1.4M
Members 310 113
Net Worth Ratio Higher = better capitalized (≥7% = "well capitalized") 9.19% 9.76%
Delinquency Rate Lower = fewer past-due loans 0.06% 0.00%
Return on Assets (ROA) Higher = more profitable 0.000% 0.000%
Loan-to-Share Ratio Higher = more loans deployed vs deposits 50.51% 48.05%
Member Growth Year-over-year membership change -8.3% 5.6%

Teal/bold = better performer on that metric. Financial ratios from most recently reported NCUA quarter.

Membership & Structure

Detail EAGLE KAN COLO
Location ATCHISON, KS HOISINGTON, KS
Charter Type Federal State
Field of Membership Community Other
Peer Group Under $2M Under $2M
Charter Number 3869 66036

What This Comparison Says About EAGLE vs KAN COLO

EAGLE (ATCHISON, KS) and KAN COLO (HOISINGTON, KS) are both federally-insured credit unions reporting quarterly to the NCUA, but they differ meaningfully in scale and profile. EAGLE holds $1.7M in assets across 310 members, while KAN COLO holds $1.4M across 113 members. On the composite health score, KAN COLO comes out ahead at 83/100 versus 68/100 for its counterpart — a gap driven by the weighted combination of capital, loan quality, earnings, growth, and liquidity metrics shown above. Charter numbers 3869 and 66036 indicate entirely separate NCUA supervisory records; they operate under peer groups Under $2M and Under $2M respectively.

Capital adequacy is the first check: EAGLE's net worth ratio of 9.19% clears the NCUA's 7.0% "well capitalized" bar, while KAN COLO posts 9.76%. Loan quality — measured as loans 60+ days past due over total loans — comes in at 0.06% for EAGLE and 0.00% for KAN COLO; lower is tighter. Earnings efficiency (ROA) shows 0.000% versus 0.000%, though credit unions as not-for-profit cooperatives often report ROA near zero by design, returning surplus to members through rates and dividends. Loan-to-share ratios of 50.51% and 48.05% indicate how each institution deploys member deposits — the 60–80% band is generally considered the balanced-liquidity window by industry analysts.

Both credit unions are covered by NCUSIF federal insurance up to $250,000 per depositor per ownership category, the same limit as FDIC coverage at banks — so the comparison here is about financial efficiency and member experience, not deposit safety. Before joining either institution, verify the field of membership: EAGLE is currently defined as "Community" and KAN COLO as "Other", and eligibility rules (employer, geography, association) determine who can actually open accounts. Current deposit rates, loan APRs, fees, and product availability change continuously and are not reflected in quarterly Call Report data — contact each credit union directly before opening accounts or borrowing. This comparison is informational only and is not financial advice, an endorsement, or a solicitation; credit union performance can shift materially quarter to quarter and should be re-evaluated with current reports before making any decision.

What to Consider When Choosing

Net Worth Ratio: The NCUA requires credit unions to maintain a net worth ratio of at least 7% to be considered "well capitalized." EAGLE shows 9.19% vs KAN COLO at 9.76%. Higher ratios indicate stronger financial buffers.

Delinquency Rate: Measures the percentage of loans that are 60+ days past due. Lower delinquency rates indicate tighter underwriting and lower credit risk. EAGLE: 0.06% — KAN COLO: 0.00%.

Return on Assets: ROA measures how efficiently a credit union generates income from its assets. Industry benchmark is typically 0.50–0.70%. Both values here may be close to zero since credit unions are not-for-profit and return value to members through lower rates and higher dividends.

Membership eligibility: Check each credit union's field of membership before applying. Many restrict membership by employer, geography, or community affiliation.

Source: NCUA Quarterly Call Report Data. Source: NCUA Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF), federal deposit insurance up to $250,000 per depositor. Financial data reflects the most recently reported quarter. Not affiliated with NCUA. All data is for informational purposes only.