Locoga scores higher on overall financial health (health score: 69/100). Higher health scores reflect stronger capital ratios, lower delinquency, and better earnings.
Financial Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Beka | Locoga |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score 0–100, higher is better | 52 | 69 |
| Total Assets | $4.7M | $4.4M |
| Members | 441 | 668 |
| Net Worth Ratio Higher = better capitalized (≥7% = "well capitalized") | 12.97% | 7.12% |
| Delinquency Rate Lower = fewer past-due loans | 2.86% | 0.10% |
| Return on Assets (ROA) Higher = more profitable | -0.215% | 0.029% |
| Loan-to-Share Ratio Higher = more loans deployed vs deposits | 96.15% | 66.50% |
| Member Growth Year-over-year membership change | -5.0% | -4.2% |
Teal/bold = better performer on that metric. Financial ratios from most recently reported NCUA quarter.
Membership & Structure
| Detail | Beka | Locoga |
|---|---|---|
| Location | Lindale, GA | Valdosta, GA |
| Charter Type | Federal | Federal |
| Field of Membership | Manufacturing | Single Common Bond |
| Peer Group | $2M–$10M | $2M–$10M |
| Charter Number | 21575 | 13516 |
What This Comparison Says About Beka vs Locoga
Beka (Lindale, GA) and Locoga (Valdosta, GA) are both federally-insured credit unions reporting quarterly to the NCUA, but they differ meaningfully in scale and profile. Beka holds $4.7M in assets across 441 members, while Locoga holds $4.4M across 668 members. On the composite health score, Locoga comes out ahead at 69/100 versus 52/100 for its counterpart, a gap driven by the weighted combination of capital, loan quality, earnings, growth, and liquidity metrics shown above. Charter numbers 21575 and 13516 indicate entirely separate NCUA supervisory records; they operate under peer groups $2M–$10M and $2M–$10M respectively.
Capital adequacy is the first check: Beka's net worth ratio of 12.97% clears the NCUA's 7.0% "well capitalized" bar, while Locoga posts 7.12%. Loan quality, measured as loans 60+ days past due over total loans, comes in at 2.86% for Beka and 0.10% for Locoga; lower is tighter. Return on assets (NCUA 5300 Call Report) shows -0.215% versus 0.029%. Loan-to-share ratios of 96.15% and 66.50% indicate how each institution deploys member deposits, the 60–80% band is generally considered the balanced-liquidity window by industry analysts.
Both credit unions are covered by NCUSIF federal insurance up to $250,000 per depositor per ownership category, the same limit as FDIC coverage at banks, so the comparison here is about financial efficiency and member experience, not deposit safety. Before joining either institution, verify the field of membership: Beka is currently defined as "Manufacturing" and Locoga as "Single Common Bond", and eligibility rules (employer, geography, association) determine who can actually open accounts. Current deposit rates, loan APRs, fees, and product availability change continuously and are not reflected in quarterly Call Report data, contact each credit union directly before opening accounts or borrowing. This comparison is informational only and is not financial advice, an endorsement, or a solicitation; credit union performance can shift materially quarter to quarter and should be re-evaluated with current reports before making any decision.
What to Consider When Choosing
Net Worth Ratio: The NCUA requires credit unions to maintain a net worth ratio of at least 7% to be considered "well capitalized." Beka shows 12.97% vs Locoga at 7.12%. Higher ratios indicate stronger financial buffers.
Delinquency Rate: Measures the percentage of loans that are 60+ days past due. Lower delinquency rates indicate tighter underwriting and lower credit risk. Beka: 2.86% - Locoga: 0.10%.
Return on Assets: ROA measures how efficiently a credit union generates income from its assets. Industry benchmark is typically 0.50–0.70%. Both values here may be close to zero since credit unions are not-for-profit and return value to members through lower rates and higher dividends.
Membership eligibility: Check each credit union's field of membership before applying. Many restrict membership by employer, geography, or community affiliation.
Every figure on PlainCU is rendered directly from NCUA quarterly call report data, no number is typed in by an editor. This comparison draws directly on NCUA quarterly call report data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.