GARY POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES vs RICHMOND LIGHT EMPLOYEES

Side-by-side comparison based on NCUA quarterly call report data.

RICHMOND LIGHT EMPLOYEES scores higher on overall financial health (health score: 63/100). Higher health scores reflect stronger capital ratios, lower delinquency, and better earnings.

Data note: This comparison uses NCUA quarterly call report data. Financial ratios reflect the most recently reported quarter. This is not a recommendation to join or leave any credit union. Membership eligibility, rates, and services vary. Verify current rates and terms directly with each credit union before making any financial decisions.
GARY POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES
Health 47/100

GARY, IN

Federal

Data: 2025Q4

RICHMOND LIGHT EMPLOYEES
Health 63/100

Richmond, IN

Federal

Data: 2025Q4

Financial Metrics Comparison

Metric GARY POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES RICHMOND LIGHT EMPLOYEES
Health Score 0–100, higher is better 47 63
Total Assets $1.2M $1.2M
Members 101 135
Net Worth Ratio Higher = better capitalized (≥7% = "well capitalized") 40.02% 21.11%
Delinquency Rate Lower = fewer past-due loans 13.75% 0.00%
Return on Assets (ROA) Higher = more profitable 0.000% 0.000%
Loan-to-Share Ratio Higher = more loans deployed vs deposits 33.97% 136.89%
Member Growth Year-over-year membership change -1.9% -13.5%

Teal/bold = better performer on that metric. Financial ratios from most recently reported NCUA quarter.

Membership & Structure

Detail GARY POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES RICHMOND LIGHT EMPLOYEES
Location GARY, IN Richmond, IN
Charter Type Federal Federal
Field of Membership Low Income Community
Peer Group Under $2M Under $2M
Charter Number 3251 17454

What This Comparison Says About GARY POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES vs RICHMOND LIGHT EMPLOYEES

GARY POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES (GARY, IN) and RICHMOND LIGHT EMPLOYEES (Richmond, IN) are both federally-insured credit unions reporting quarterly to the NCUA, but they differ meaningfully in scale and profile. GARY POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES holds $1.2M in assets across 101 members, while RICHMOND LIGHT EMPLOYEES holds $1.2M across 135 members. On the composite health score, RICHMOND LIGHT EMPLOYEES comes out ahead at 63/100 versus 47/100 for its counterpart — a gap driven by the weighted combination of capital, loan quality, earnings, growth, and liquidity metrics shown above. Charter numbers 3251 and 17454 indicate entirely separate NCUA supervisory records; they operate under peer groups Under $2M and Under $2M respectively.

Capital adequacy is the first check: GARY POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES's net worth ratio of 40.02% clears the NCUA's 7.0% "well capitalized" bar, while RICHMOND LIGHT EMPLOYEES posts 21.11%. Loan quality — measured as loans 60+ days past due over total loans — comes in at 13.75% for GARY POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES and 0.00% for RICHMOND LIGHT EMPLOYEES; lower is tighter. Earnings efficiency (ROA) shows 0.000% versus 0.000%, though credit unions as not-for-profit cooperatives often report ROA near zero by design, returning surplus to members through rates and dividends. Loan-to-share ratios of 33.97% and 136.89% indicate how each institution deploys member deposits — the 60–80% band is generally considered the balanced-liquidity window by industry analysts.

Both credit unions are covered by NCUSIF federal insurance up to $250,000 per depositor per ownership category, the same limit as FDIC coverage at banks — so the comparison here is about financial efficiency and member experience, not deposit safety. Before joining either institution, verify the field of membership: GARY POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES is currently defined as "Low Income" and RICHMOND LIGHT EMPLOYEES as "Community", and eligibility rules (employer, geography, association) determine who can actually open accounts. Current deposit rates, loan APRs, fees, and product availability change continuously and are not reflected in quarterly Call Report data — contact each credit union directly before opening accounts or borrowing. This comparison is informational only and is not financial advice, an endorsement, or a solicitation; credit union performance can shift materially quarter to quarter and should be re-evaluated with current reports before making any decision.

What to Consider When Choosing

Net Worth Ratio: The NCUA requires credit unions to maintain a net worth ratio of at least 7% to be considered "well capitalized." GARY POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES shows 40.02% vs RICHMOND LIGHT EMPLOYEES at 21.11%. Higher ratios indicate stronger financial buffers.

Delinquency Rate: Measures the percentage of loans that are 60+ days past due. Lower delinquency rates indicate tighter underwriting and lower credit risk. GARY POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES: 13.75% — RICHMOND LIGHT EMPLOYEES: 0.00%.

Return on Assets: ROA measures how efficiently a credit union generates income from its assets. Industry benchmark is typically 0.50–0.70%. Both values here may be close to zero since credit unions are not-for-profit and return value to members through lower rates and higher dividends.

Membership eligibility: Check each credit union's field of membership before applying. Many restrict membership by employer, geography, or community affiliation.

Source: NCUA Quarterly Call Report Data. Source: NCUA Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF), federal deposit insurance up to $250,000 per depositor. Financial data reflects the most recently reported quarter. Not affiliated with NCUA. All data is for informational purposes only.